Legal Opinion

Diego J. Herbstein v. Martin E. Bruetman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 21, 2001No. 00-2523PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The refractory Martin Bruetman is back. Almost a decade ago Bruetman sustained a $19 million default judgment when he left for Argentina rather than participate in discovery during a civil suit in Chicago. We told the district court to give Bruetman a second chance if he returned to the United States and cooperated fully. Philips Medical Systems International, B.V. v. Bruetman, 982 F.2d 211 (7th Cir.1992). Bruetman returned but bridled at following directions. He announced that he would be the judge of which judicial orders would be implemented. That defiant stance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. VeluchamyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Herbstein v. BruetmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe and First Choice Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Herbstein v. Bruetman (In Re Bruetman)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Arthur L. Lewis, Jr., et al. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API