Legal Opinion

People v. Durda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur to Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing (People v Durda, 259 AD2d 996), the court properly determined, based upon the testimony adduced at the hearing (see, People v Alomar, 93 NY2d 239), that the People’s Ventimiglia application was decided on papers alone and that no off-the-record proceeding occurred. We conclude, therefore, that the People met their burden at the reconstruction hearing of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant was not denied the right to be present at a Ventimiglia proceeding (see,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. AlomarNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. DurdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. WALKER, FREDERICK E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API