People v. Durda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur to Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing (People v Durda, 259 AD2d 996), the court properly determined, based upon the testimony adduced at the hearing (see, People v Alomar, 93 NY2d 239), that the People’s Ventimiglia application was decided on papers alone and that no off-the-record proceeding occurred. We conclude, therefore, that the People met their burden at the reconstruction hearing of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant was not denied the right to be present at a Ventimiglia proceeding (see,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. AlomarNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. DurdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- WALKER, FREDERICK E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014