Legal Opinion

People v. Durda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record does not indicate whether defendant was present at a Ventimiglia proceeding held off the record. Because the outcome of the proceeding was not entirely favorable to defendant, we cannot conclude from this record that defendant’s presence would have been superfluous (see, People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254, 267, rearg denied 83 NY2d 801). We therefore remit, the matter to Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906, 907;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. MichalekNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DurdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API