Legal Opinion
Cwiakala v. Giunta
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 N.J. Super. 261 (1952)
92 A.2d 849
STANLEY CWIAKALA AND ARNO J. PICKEL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HARRY GIUNTA, CARMELA GIUNTA, HIS WIFE, CARMEN G. DE MEGLIO, AND CHARLES GAMBA, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 24, 1952.
Mr. Arthur E. Dienst, attorney of plaintiffs.
Mr. Jacob M. Goldberg, attorney for defendants Harry Giunta and Carmela Giunta.
Mr. Michael L. Mango, attorney for defendants Carmen G. DeMeglio and Charles Gamba.
COLIE, J.S.C.
This is a suit for specific performance. The matter is now before the court upon a motion for summary judgment. The facts are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McVoy v. BaumannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Page v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
- Weidenbaum v. RaphaelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
- Carluccio v. 607 Hudson St. Holding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wellmore Builders, Inc. v. WannierNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. MormannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- First National State Bank v. Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978