McVoy v. Baumann
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, ivhose opinion is reported in 92 N. J-. Eg. 860.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered b3r
Minturn, J.
A valid contract, in writing, was entered into by the defendant on July 19th, 1920, with Herbert C. MeVoy, the husband of the complainant, to convey to him certain lands in Westfield, the deed to be delivered on October 1st, 1920. Prior to the latter date MeV>3r, with the consent of Baumann, assigned the contract to the complainant. The original contract of purchase was duly recorded in the register’s office of Union county, on *640October 4th, 1920, and thereby operated as constructive notice to all subsequent purchasers of the legal and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hays v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
3Cited by8 opinions
- Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Boehm v. RiederNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Cwiakala v. GiuntaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Cubberly v. Homecrafters, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- D'Angelo v. Rand Development Corp. (In re Mastapeter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.