Legal Opinion

Carluccio v. 607 Hudson St. Holding Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 19, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Freund, J.

Joseph A. Oarluccio appeals from a decree of the Court of Chancery dismissing his bill for specific performance of a written contract for the sale of realty of which he is the assignee.

The premises, No. 607 Hudson Street, in the City of Hobo-ken, a four-family dwelling house, is owned by respondent, a holding company, for Mr. and Mrs. William Eendler. They were acquainted with Sol Rosenbaum, a real estate broker. In February, 1946, Rosenbaum solicited Eendler with a view to selling the property. In ensuing conversations the price was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Marschall v. MarschallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Silverman v. BresnahanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Cwiakala v. GiuntaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Thompson Realty Co. v. HoaglandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API