Legal Opinion
Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2003No. 99-56673PublishedCited by 608 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed August 27, 2002, and appearing at 300 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir.2002) is amended. The amended opinion is filed herewith.
Petitioner’s motion to withdraw his motion to file a pro se petition for panel and en banc rehearing is granted.
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the respondent’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge Paez has voted to deny respondent’s petition for en banc rehearing, and Judges Lay and Canby so recommend. The full court has been advised of respondent’s petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter ■ en…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by608 opinions
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gary Paul Cassett v. Terry L. Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- King v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Fred Jay Jackson v. Ernest C. Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
603 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.