Legal Opinion
King v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2009No. 06-55858PublishedCited by 389 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Jonathan King appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. King filed a “mixed” habeas petition in federal court— that is, one including both exhausted and unexhausted claims — just two days before the end of the one-year statute of limitations applicable under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AED-PA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). King then asked the district court to stay the petition and dismiss his unexhausted claims so that he could exhaust them in state court before adding them back into the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by389 opinions
- Alfonso Blake v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Pablo Bastidas v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Fairchild v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ha Nguyen v. Ben CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Keith Mitchell v. Anthony HedgpethCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
384 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.