Legal Opinion

Bass v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1955No. Civ. No. 3787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

In removing the instant case to this Court, the defendants urge that no cause of action has been stated against the *681resident individual defendants, employees of defendant Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company, a Delaware corporation,1 and that said employees have been fraudulently joined for the sole purpose of defeating federal jurisdiction. Because of the lack of diversity, plaintiff challenges this Court’s jurisdiction and moves that the case be remanded.

After carefully considering briefs of counsel and the evidence introduced at the hearing on this motion, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Morefield v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Woolley v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Duncan v. FlaglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Freedom, Okl. v. Muskogee Bridge Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Harris Diamond Co. v. Army Times Publishing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API