Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2011No. 25650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Robert Thomas Johnson (Johnson) appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. Johnson was convicted of robbing a Sioux Falls casino. Johnson argues that the evidence obtained from the search of his vehicle should have been suppressed because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to initiate the traffic stop. The trial court denied Johnson’s motion to suppress. Because the initial stop of Johnson’s vehicle was based on specific, articulable facts that reasonably supported the initial detention, we affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In the early morning hours of July 31, 2009,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. KrebsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. BonackerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. ChaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BonackerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API