Legal Opinion
State v. Krebs
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1993No. 17877, 17882PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Justice.
Defendants Krebs and Davis were tried jointly for third-degree burglary, grand theft and possession of burglary tools with intent to commit burglary. Krebs was convicted on all three charges and Davis was convicted of grand theft and possession of burglary tools with intent to commit burglary. Each was represented by different counsel and each has filed a separate appeal. Since the facts and two of the issues are the same in both cases, we have consolidated the appeals for the purposes of this opinion.
Both Krebs and Davis claim the trial court erred in denying their separate…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LamontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.