Legal Opinion
Johnson v. M & M Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 29, 2007No. Civ. No. 3:06CV01434(AWT)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Defendant M & M Communications, Inc. moves to strike paragraphs 29 and 30 of the Amended Complaint (paragraphs 32 through 34 of the Second Amended Complaint) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is being denied.
In the Second Amended Complaint, the plaintiffs allege:
32. Subsequently, the Field Audit Unit of the Connecticut Department of Labor conducted a wage investigation of Defendant and concluded that Plaintiff Johnson was not an “independent contractor,” but was an employee of Defendant.
33.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- National Council of Young Israel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Gotlin v. LedermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re OSG Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Caison v. DejoyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Lorenzo v. 12 Chairs BYN, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Meyer v. Panera Bread CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.