Legal Opinion
Painters of Philadelphia District Council No. 21 Welfare Fund v. Price Waterhouse
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 10, 1989No. 88-1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.
I
This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim, 699 F.Supp. 1100. Plaintiffs-Appellants are Painters of Philadelphia District Council No. 21 Welfare Fund and William Dalton, Harold Johnson, George Clark, Gerard Doto, Herbert Tiedeken, Richard Schroeder, Herbert Lewin as trustees of that Fund. Defendant-Appellee is the accounting firm of Price Waterhouse, which performed several yearly audits for the Painters’ Fund.
We are asked in this appeal to resolve three principal issues: (1) whether Price…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Painters Of Philadelphia District Council No. 21 Welfare Fund v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989