Legal Opinion
Rohe v. Froehlke
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 12, 1973No. 73-C-887PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Petitioner, John T. Rohe, applies for a preliminary and permanent injunction and a writ of mandamus directing the above respondents to cancel petitioner’s order to active duty as an unsatisfactory reservist, and to cancel warrants outstanding against him for failure to obey orders to active duty. On June 22, 1973, the Court stayed the removal of Rohe from the jurisdiction of the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, released him from the physical custody of the respondents and returned him to duty as a New York City policeman until the determination of this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Joachim Hagopian v. Major General William KnowltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John T. Rohe v. Robert T. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army, and Commanding General, First United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974