Legal Opinion
John T. Rohe v. Robert T. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army, and Commanding General, First United States Army
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 3, 1974No. 893, Docket 74-1002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Rohe brought this action for injunction and other relief claiming that the procedure by which he was ordered to active duty as an unsatisfactory reservist was improper because in appealing the order under Army Regulation 135-91, jf 20, he was not informed of or permitted to answer adverse factual allegations placed in his file. The district court held that the regulation did not require the Army to show the comments to appellant. The court denied Rohe’s request for injunctive relief and granted the government’s motion for summary judgment. 368 F.Supp. 114…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Jeffrey Hale PurvisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Harold L. Crotty v. Lawrence R. Kelly, Commanding OfficerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Nurnberg v. FroehlkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Rohe v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ruth E. Buck, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, Dr. Bernard E. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Fisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Peters v. Secretary of ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- Ruth E. Buck, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, Dr. Bernard E. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Ruth E. Buck, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, Dr. Bernard E. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977