Legal Opinion

Burt v. Blumenauer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. A8112-07355; CA A25112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This is an action brought under ORS 294.100, which reads in pertinent part:

“(1) It is unlawful for any public official to expend any money in excess of the amounts, or for any other or different purpose than provided by law.
“(2) Any public official who expends any public money in excess of the amounts, or for any other or different purpose or purposes than authorized by law, shall be civilly liable for the return of the money by suit of the district attorney of the district where the offense is committed, or at the suit of any taxpayer of such district.”

Also pertinent is ORS 260.432, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Porter v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Oregonians Against Trapping v. Oregon State Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cruz v. Multnomah CountyMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Burt v. BlumenauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API