Legal Opinion

Porter v. Tiffany

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1972No. 101273PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Plaintiff brought this action as a taxpayer under ORS 294.100 ① to require the five commissioners of the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB), a municipally owned utility, to personally reimburse EWEB for expenditures of $6,710.38 in 1968 and $6,608.13 in 1970. These funds were expended by the defendants in connection with two election measures. The 1968 measure involved authorizing the issuance and sale of $225 million in bonds to allow EWEB to participate in a nuclear power program. The television and radio time, newspaper advertising, voter surveys and other materials purchased by EWEB…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Mines v. Del ValleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Trickey v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Elsenau v. City of Chicago.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Shannon v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Greater Boise Auditorium DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Anderson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API