Porter v. Tiffany
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Plaintiff brought this action as a taxpayer under ORS 294.100 ① to require the five commissioners of the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB), a municipally owned utility, to personally reimburse EWEB for expenditures of $6,710.38 in 1968 and $6,608.13 in 1970. These funds were expended by the defendants in connection with two election measures. The 1968 measure involved authorizing the issuance and sale of $225 million in bonds to allow EWEB to participate in a nuclear power program. The television and radio time, newspaper advertising, voter surveys and other materials purchased by EWEB…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Mines v. Del ValleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Trickey v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Elsenau v. City of Chicago.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Shannon v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Greater Boise Auditorium DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Anderson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.