Fritz v. British America Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 32, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1899, No. 654, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of A. P. Fritz v. British America Assurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Wilt-bank, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Hrror assigned was order refusing to take off nonsuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mesteezat,
This is an action of assumpsit on a fire insurance policy, issued by the appellee company on certain personal property owned by the appellant and in the building occupied as a file works at 20 th street and Allegheny avenue, in the city of Philadelphia. The policy is dated April 6, 1897, and is in the sum of $2,500. At the time this policy was issued to the appellant, he procured five other policies from various companies on the same property, aggregating $17,500, making a total insurance on the property of $20,000. The property was partially destroyed by fire…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Diamon v. Penn Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- D'Ambrosio v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- O'Connor v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Collins v. Home Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Abolin v. Farmers Amer. Mut. Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.