Legal Opinion

D'Ambrosio v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1979No. 390PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

The six Judges who decided this appeal being equally divided, the order is affirmed.

An opinion per curiam in support of affirmance is filed in which PRICE, VAN der VOORT and HESTER, JJ., join. PER CURIAM

opinion in support of affirmance:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, of Delaware County which sustained appellee’s preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to Count Two of appellant’s complaint.

Appellant, Anthony E. D’Ambrosio, Jr., was an insured of appellee’s whereby a boat owned by the appellant was covered by the appellee-company. The boat…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. D'AMBROSIO v. Pa. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Daughen v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Hoffman v. Memorial Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Roberts v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API