Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Jones

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1978No. 78-97-CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Armour and Company brings this diversity action seeking to recover on a promissory note executed by Defendant Frank Jones. Jones has filed a Counterclaim against Plaintiff and a Third Party Complaint against Tahlequah Mill and Elevator (Tahlequah Mill) and First National Bank of Tahlequah (First National Bank). The matter is now before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Third-Party Complaint and the Motions of Tahlequah Mill and First National Bank to dismiss Jones’ Third Party Complaint. Said parties have each filed a brief in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. C. Gaines, Jr. v. Sunray Oil Company, Amtel, Inc. v. E. Paul Wilkinson and J. Howard Marshall, as Individuals and as the Executive AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Parr v. Great Lakes Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Meilinger v. Metropolitan Edison Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API