Meilinger v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
Defendant, Metropolitan Edison Company, seeks to join plaintiff’s employer, William Higgins & Sons, Inc., of Buffalo, N. Y., as a third party defendant. Defendant alleges (1) that Higgins was negligent in the performance of the work; *144(2) that Higgins agreed to indemnify defendant for all losses arising out of thev work.
The accident happened on August 2, 1959. Suit was started December 5,> 1960, .and defendant’s answer was filed on January 25, 1961. Thus, under our Local Rule 19(a), defendant had until July 25, 1961, to join Higgins. It is now thirty-four…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Frankel v. Alan Wood Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- McSparran v. GableDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodman v. NeffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- West v. HawkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Kubik v. GoldfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Armour & Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978