Legal Opinion

Meilinger v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 28932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

Defendant, Metropolitan Edison Company, seeks to join plaintiff’s employer, William Higgins & Sons, Inc., of Buffalo, N. Y., as a third party defendant. Defendant alleges (1) that Higgins was negligent in the performance of the work; *144(2) that Higgins agreed to indemnify defendant for all losses arising out of thev work.

The accident happened on August 2, 1959. Suit was started December 5,> 1960, .and defendant’s answer was filed on January 25, 1961. Thus, under our Local Rule 19(a), defendant had until July 25, 1961, to join Higgins. It is now thirty-four…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Frankel v. Alan Wood Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. McSparran v. GableDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. NeffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. West v. HawkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Kubik v. GoldfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Armour & Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API