Legal Opinion
Kosters v. Hoover
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 16, 1938No. 6954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Henry F. Woodard was the owner of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on certain real property in the District of Columbia. The note being past due and unpaid, Woodard directed the trustees to sell the property — which they did on November 17, 1933, at public auction. The property was bid in 'in the name of Alice S. Woodard, wife of Henry F. Woodard, at a price of $5500, subject to a first mortgage, unpaid taxes and interest. A deed — conveying the property to Alice S. Woodard — previously prepared by Woodard, which recited that the purchase money had been…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Edwards v. WoodsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- First Maryland Financial Services Corp. v. District-Realty Title Insurance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor (Brookland Garage). On Notice of Intent to Turn Over Possession of Brookland Garage PropertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.