Legal Opinion

Senato v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 16, 1949No. 183, Docket 21241PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is by the mother of a deceased soldier of the United States who, as the beneficiary named in each of the policies, claims the proceeds of two National Service Life Insurance Policies which matured when he was killed in action. The appellee is the widow of the soldier who claims the proceeds of both policies as the substituted beneficiary. The trial court found that the widow was the substituted beneficiary and held that she was entitled to the proceeds of both policies.

The facts which were relied on to support the findings and judgment were proved by records…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Kuhn v. Princess Lida of Thurn & TaxisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  5. McKewen v. McKewenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Eve B. Pahmer, Eva PahmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Boring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Krimlofski v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
  4. Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
  5. Bratcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API