Legal Opinion
Boring v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1950No. 4014PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. ■
The question in this case is whether Robert E. Boring, a soldier in the late'wa-r, effectively changed the beneficiary in his National Service Life Insurance Policy from his mother, Junie Pearl Boring, to his wife, Mary Lucille Boring. Upon his death, both the wife and his mother filed claims for the insurance benefits. The Veterans Administration determined the wife to be the beneficiary. The mother thereupon instituted this action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. That court held there was a valid change in beneficiary and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Shapiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Widney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Senato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Brett StormerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Kell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Josephine D. Lovato v. United States of America and Friedericka De Los SantosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Littlefield v. LittlefieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.