Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D. C.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 6, 2011No. A10A2154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIKELL, Judge.

Following a hearing on March 17, 2010, D. C., a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent after admitting to the designated felony offenses of theft by taking — motor vehicle1 (two acts) and violation of probation. D. C. was sentenced to restrictive custody for 24 months, pursuant to OCGA § 15-11-63 (b).2 Acting pro se, D. C.’s *543father filed a notice of appeal3 from the juvenile court’s order, asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. We remand for a hearing on this issue.

Construed in favor of the juvenile court’s adjudication of delinquency,4 the evidence shows that on November 9,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Pinkston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. In the Interest of J. L. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. In the Interest of J. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. In the Interest of D. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.C.M., a Minor v. Pemiscot County Juvenile OfficeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. READO-SECK v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. In the Interest of N. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. In Re DcCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. In the Interest Of: N. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API