In the Interest of N. M.

McFadden, Judge.

N. M., a juvenile, appeals from the order of disposition imposed after his probation was revoked for the second time. He argues that the trial court erred by relying on a provision of the designated felony statute — a provision that was repealed after his original act of delinquency — as authority to impose a period of restrictive custody following the revocation of probation. We conclude that the juvenile *650court could impose an order of disposition that was appropriate under the law at the time of the original act of delinquency for which the juvenile court imposed probation.…