Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D.C.M., a Minor v. Pemiscot County Juvenile Office
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided August 13, 2019No. SC97595PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mary R. Russell, Judge D.C.M. appeals a judgment of the circuit court finding he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the felony of making a terrorist threat in the second degree in violation of section 574.120. 1 Evidence adduced at the adjudication hearing demonstrated D.C.M. was sitting in the school cafeteria talking to another student, Jonathan, 2 when D.C.M. stated he felt like "blowing the school up" or wanted to see how it feels to "shoot the school up."
D.C.M. argues his attorney ("Counsel") was ineffective in representing him in the juvenile…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- D.R.F., III v. D.L.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Dustin M. Bray v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., and Envoy Mortgage, LPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- EDWARD A. RILEY, II, and NATALIE D. RILEY, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. RANDALL ZOLL and LANDALL ZOLLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- IN THE INTEREST OF D.E.P., JR., GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE v. D.E.P., JRMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- IN THE INTEREST OF P.J.T., SCOTT COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICER, Petitioner-Respondent v. P.J.T.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.