Legal Opinion
In Re Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation. Sheldon Danuff, Skat Capital Lp and Joel D. Zychick
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 18, 2006No. 04-1410PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Sheldon Danuff, SKAT Capital, and Joel Zychick (collectively, “Appellants”) challenge a District Court order rejecting their claims for compensation under a plan of allocation for a class action settlement. At the threshold, this case requires us to decide whether Appellants’ notice of appeal was timely filed. Under the rules of civil and appellate procedure, the notice was timely filed only if the District Court’s order ruling against Appellants was not a “separate document” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. To determine…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community Center Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United Automobile Workers Local 259 Social Security Department v. Metro Auto CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- PG Publishing Co v. Newspaper Guild of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Ana SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.