Legal Opinion
Kennison v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 26, 1924No. 8263PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
Conviction is for attempting to pass as true an alleged forged instrument, the punishment assessed being two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The instrument upon which the prosecution is based is as follows :
“Texarkana, Tex., February 2, 1923, No. 314 The Texarkana National Bank Pay to J. E. Richardson or bearer $25.00 Pay $25 and 00 cts.
J. E. Archer,
Asst, cashier.”
It is made to appear that after appellant was arrested and while confined in jail upon this charge the county attorney caused him to be brought to the county attorney’s office and there had appellant write the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Stanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Blackshear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Meza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Click v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.