Legal Opinion

Meza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1962No. 34686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is challenged.

The question is whether the circumstantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the state, is sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that the appellant is the person who committed the offense.

The deceased, a 50 year old Latin American, 5 feet 6 inches in height and weighing 181 pounds, met his death in Houston shortly after 1:15 A.M. by being stabbed in the back.

The wound was described by the Harris County Medical Examiner, whose…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leahy v. LeahySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Feather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Bearden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Earwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Sikes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montoya v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1981
  2. Fretwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Monasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API