Legal Opinion

Elaine Mittleman v. Postal Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 8, 2014No. 12-1095, 12-1110, 12-1157PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GARLAND.

GARLAND, Chief Judge:

The petitioners in these consolidated cases do not want their local post offices closed. They unsuccessfully opposed the closures of the three post offices at issue by the United States Postal Service, unsuccessfully appealed the Postal Service’s determinations to the Postal Regulatory Commission, and now seek review of the Commission’s decisions in this court. Because one of the petitions has become moot, and because the other two involve Commission decisions that are not subject to judicial review, their current effort…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Iron Arrow Honor Society v. HecklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Changji Esquel Textile Co. Ltd. v. Gina RaimondoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  2. Federal Express Corporation v. U.S. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  3. Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  4. Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. National Association of Postal Supervisors v. USPSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API