Legal Opinion

Pipe Line Park Properties, Inc. v. Fraser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1965No. 16640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This case reaches us by writ of error and the sole question is whether the petitioner Pipe Line Park Properties, Inc. is entitled to a reversal of the default judgment rendered against it as garnishee, in garnishment proceedings instituted by the respondent Jack Fraser, for lack of proper service of the writ of garnishment. The constable’s return on the writ recites that it was served on petitioner by delivering to Donald Zalej, its vice-president. This would indicate proper service on petitioner, which is a domestic corporation, pursuant to Art. 2.11, Texas Business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. White Motor Company v. LodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. American Soda Fountain Co. v. Hairston Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gerland's Food Fair, Inc. v. HareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Vogel v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Trevino v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  4. Dan Edge Motors, Inc. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Cox Marketing, Inc. v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API