Legal Opinion
Otto v. Reardon
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1937No. Civ. 5717PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
—This is an appeal from a judgment which was rendered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition for a writ of mandamus, without leave to amend.
The amended petition for a writ of mandamus alleges that the appellant holds a permanent civil service status in the state of California as “Senior Stenographer Clerk” in the Division of Industrial Welfare, as regularly classified by the board June 25, 1931; that the duties of this office required her, “Under supervision, to take shorthand notes from dictation and accurately to transcribe them on a typewriter; to do general typing, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mann v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pinion v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Reilly v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Dominey v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Anderson v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.