Legal Opinion
Dominey v. Department of Personnel Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1988No. C002852PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Plaintiffs, 48 current and former special investigators and senior special investigators with the Department of Justice’s Medi-Cal Fraud Unit (MCFU), appeal from the judgment denying their first amended petition for writ of mandamus. By that petition, plaintiffs sought to compel the respondent Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) (1) to award them backpay for work they allegedly performed “out of class” and (2) to reclassify their positions to that of special agents, or to order DPA to grant them a rehearing. The trial court treated the hearing provided by DPA as…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- 20th Century Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Graham v. Kirkwood Meadows Public Utilities DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Rodriguez v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.