Legal Opinion
NICKERSON-MALPHER v. Worley
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 17, 2008No. Civil 07-136-P-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS AND INJUNCTION AGAINST FURTHER FILINGS
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The remaining defendants Worley, Fraser, and Perry have moved to dismiss the plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against them. I Grant the motion. I also Deny the plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint and her motion for recusal. I Enjoin her from further amendments adding additional defendants, and I warn her about continued frivolous filings. Her remedy for any discontent she has with this decision is to appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
I. Pending Motions
(A)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- IN RE: SCOTT L. FENSTERMAKER, ESQ.District Court, D. Maine · 2023
- PORTER v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023