Legal Opinion
Matter of Discipline of Henke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1987No. C8-86-1846PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On September 17, 1986, the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent. Respondent admitted service of the petition but failed to interpose an answer. On December 3, 1986, this court issued its order declaring that the allegations of the September 17, 1986, petition are deemed admitted, pursuant to Rule 13(c), Minnesota Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR).
Respondent had been placed on restricted status by order dated January 29, 1980 for failure to comply with continuing legal education (OLE) requirements. An…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PokornySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Appeal of Admonition Regarding A.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995