Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Company v. Foster

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1966No. 7770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

The facts of the case are generally undisputed and not complicated. Some time prior to July 2, 1962, Poynor’s White Stores, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Poynor’s,” had appellant Foster write all of their insurance. At that time appellant sent all Poynor’s old policies to someone in Albuquerque, but the workmen’s compensation policy was not included. On July 2, Poynor’s informed appellant of two minor accidents involving their employees, and it was at that time that appellant first became aware that no workmen’s compensation insurance had been written. Upon advising…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Employers Fire Insurance v. SpeedMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co v. Hubbs-Johnson Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Milwaukee Bedding Co. v. GraebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Kleis v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Barnett v. Cal M, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ellingwood Ex Rel. Estate Streeter v. N.N. Investors Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Western Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API