Legal Opinion

Brown v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 20, 2011No. AC 31707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ESPINOSA, J.

Upon the granting of certification to appeal by the habeas court, the petitioner, Michael Brown, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly failed to conclude that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance that affected the outcome of his criminal trial. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the present appeal. In 2004, the petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of sexual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Fernandez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Stepney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Salters v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Marshall v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API