Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 18, 2018No. AC38861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, J.

The petitioner, Charles Marshall, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court erroneously determined that his trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by (1) having an actual conflict of interest as a result of his prior representation of a witness in an unrelated criminal case; (2) failing to object to the trial court's exclusion of the petitioner from participation in an in-chambers conference; (3) failing to move to suppress one witness' identification of him from a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Arnold Lynn v. Dennis Bliden, First Deputy Supt.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zachs v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Marshall v. BeroneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API