Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 22, 2014No. AC33343PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The petitioner, Marquis Jackson, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erred in (1) denying his ineffective assistance of counsel claim; (2) denying his actual innocence claim and applying an incorrect legal standard in doing so; (3) denying his due process claim; and (4) refusing to accept his withdrawal of his petition without prejudice. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts, as set forth in the petitioner’s direct appeal; State v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Horn v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Meletrich v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  4. Jackson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. Meletrich v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API