Legal Opinion

Keyston v. Banta-Carbona Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1937No. Civ. 5682PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

These petitioners, who are the owners and holders of coupons of certain bonds of the above-entitled district, are seeking by this writ of mandate to compel respondents to transfer to the bond interest fund of the district, all moneys which constitute the proceeds of assessments heretofore levied for bond interest, and to pay out said' moneys to holders of coupons entitled thereto.

Since the issuance of the bonds to which these coupons were attached, the district, it is alleged, has regularly levied as sessments on the lands within its boundaries for the purpose of paying the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Leyva v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Zisk v. City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Morris v. South San Joaquin Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API