Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 4, 1928No. 12,038PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee' Justice Denison

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

Dependants in error, plaintiffs below, brought mandamus to compel Armstrong, secretary of state, to issue licenses to them for their automobiles upon payment of all fees except those required by S. L. 1927, chapter 135. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, the defendant elected to stand, the writ was made permanent and he brings error.

The pertinent part of the statute in question is as follows: “That there shall be paid, in addition to the fees now required by law, for the registration or re-registration of motor vehicles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. State v. DabneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. State v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Armstrong v. Crissey & Fowler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schroath v. CondryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Corpus Christi v. McClaughertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Mildred L. Smith v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Brown v. National Motor Fleets, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API