Legal Opinion
Brown v. National Motor Fleets, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 13, 1964No. 6 Div. 805PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
On original deliverance the Chief Justice reversed and remanded the case for reasons given, which opinion will be his dissent. On application for rehearing and further consideration a majority of the Justices hold to the view that the judgment should be affirmed.
The facts in this case appear in the dissenting opinion. The Court thinks that the learned Chief Justice in his dissenting opinion has failed to take due account of the Title of said Act No. 672, which gives notice that the Act shall apply only to "trucks, truck-tractors, trailers, and semi-trailers operated for hire”.
The term…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Opinion of JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- People v. Heckman Trucking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- City of Sioux Falls v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. L. P. Gas Transport Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BallardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- In Re WalleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981
- Baroco v. Araserv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- National Motor Fleets, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.