State v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
Two appeals are here involved, consolidated for the purposes of the hearing. As they present hut a single question, we may treat them as one.
The corporation defendant and the individual defendant were charged by information with having violated the statute commonly known as the jitney bus act. Laws of 1915, p. 227; Rem. Comp. Stat., §§ 6382, 6384, 6385. This statute makes it unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, other than a steam, street or interurban railway company, to engage in or carry on the business of carrying or transporting passengers for hire in any motor propelled vehicles…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- State v. DabneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- State ex rel. Schroath v. CondryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.