Lind v. Canada Dry Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
In this diversity personal injury action, defendant has made a number of pre-trial motions. The court has entered a separate dispositive order.
1. Defendant’s first motion is to dismiss for want of jurisdiction because the matter in controversy it claims does not meet the jurisdictional requirement of $10,000.00. Plaintiff’s counsel stated in open court that as a result of a rear end automobile collision plaintiff had suffered a total loss of his car in the amount of $950.00; had lost wages in an amount approximating. $1,500; had had substantial medical expenses; and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Willis v. Semmes, Bowen & SemmesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Garner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.