Legal Opinion

Lind v. Canada Dry Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1968No. 3-67 Civ. 182PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVILLE, District Judge.

In this diversity personal injury action, defendant has made a number of pre-trial motions. The court has entered a separate dispositive order.

1. Defendant’s first motion is to dismiss for want of jurisdiction because the matter in controversy it claims does not meet the jurisdictional requirement of $10,000.00. Plaintiff’s counsel stated in open court that as a result of a rear end automobile collision plaintiff had suffered a total loss of his car in the amount of $950.00; had lost wages in an amount approximating. $1,500; had had substantial medical expenses; and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Willis v. Semmes, Bowen & SemmesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Garner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API