Industrial Loan & Investment Bank v. Dardine
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
The assignments of error present but the single question : Did the court err in charging the jury as indicated ?
The defense that she did not know the contents of the instrument at the time she signed it cannot avail the defendant in the face of her own testimony that “I can read. . . . He (her husband and codefend-ant) asked me, Hear, please sign that for me,’ and I did it.” It was the defendant’s duty to have read, or to have had read to her, the contract, or note, and her failure to do so, in the absence of fraud, is negligence for which the law affords no redress. Colt Company v. Kimball,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bank of Lewiston v. HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Ghormley v. . HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. . Ayres.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.