United States v. Conrad Fox

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Conrad A. Fox seeks reversal of his conviction of armed robbery 1 and assault with a dangerous weapon 2 on essentially four grounds. First he asserts that prejudicial error was committed when the District Court ruled that the Government could ask a defense character witness questions concerning Fox’s arrest for rape. Second Fox claims that reversal is compelled because the prosecution’s main witness was permitted to testify that she had identified Fox at a pretrial lineup where he was allegedly not represented by counsel. Third Fox argues that, even…