Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Wayne County Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Speed, J.) Bill of interpleader. Defendant Alice H. Curtis appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

Both defendants in this case claim the amount of moneys due upon two policies of insurance issued by the complainant upon the life of George E. Curtis, who was the husband of Alice H. Curtis, one of the defendants.

On November 28, 1864, the company issued the first policy, in the sum of $3,000, to Mrs. Curtis, by the terms of which it was made payable to her if she survived her husband, and, if not, then to be paid to their children, or to their guardian.

December 31, 1866, the company issued the second policy, in the sum of $5,000, to George E. Ourtis, payable to the *118assured, his executors,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eadie v. . SlimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  4. Tompkins v. HollisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. West v. LarawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Garrison v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Menard v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wendland v. Citizens Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API