Garrison v. Union Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Replevin by James H. Garrison against the Union Trust Company, special administrator of the estate of Kit-tie Levering, deceased, for a diamond ring. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The plaintiff, James H. Garrison, commenced an action of replevin against the defendant, as special administrator of the estate of Kittie Levering, deceased, to recover possession of a diamond ring, to which he claimed title by gift. His title was contested by the defendant, and the issue was determined by a jury in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant asks this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court for several reasons, chief of which is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. It was the claim of plaintiff that Kittie Levering gave him thé ring while he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gannon v. . McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Ivey's Adm'r v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Crittenden v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Campbell v. SechMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Whitford v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edson v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Geisel v. BurgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Grimes v. BarndollarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Adams v. HagerottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.