Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Lehl

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1915No. 4039PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Adams District Court. Hon. Chas. McCall, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

Plaintiff was the lessee of a farm, and sued the lessor for $2056.65, damages to growing crops, alleged to have been caused by the lessor’s failure to pay for the water for irrigation thereof, as provided in a written lease. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $318.15, and defendant assigns error on the following grounds:

First, it is contended that the action was not in the name of the real party in interest, because it appeared on the back of the lease, when it was set forth in an amendment to the. complaint, and when it was introduced in evidence, that it had been assigned. Such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. SchofieldTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Crow v. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Redwine v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bader v. Mills & Baker Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hoover v. ShottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API